Service
Market Entry

International Business Development

Entering a market is a sequence of reversible and irreversible decisions. The work is knowing which is which before you sign anything.

Focus
Research, entry design, partners
Typical engagement
10 to 24 weeks
Works best when
The market is chosen, the route is not

Research that answers the question you actually have

Most market research answers the question of how large a market is. That is rarely the binding question. The binding questions are who currently captures the margin, what a newcomer has to give up to be allowed in, how quickly a local incumbent can copy what you brought, and whether the regulatory position that makes the opportunity attractive is stable or seasonal.

We build the picture from primary sources: distributors, former employees of the incumbents, regulators, freight agents, customs brokers, and the people who lost money in the market before you arrived. Published data sets the frame. Conversations tell you where the frame is wrong.

Choosing the entry structure before choosing the partner

The most expensive mistake in cross-border expansion is selecting a partner first and reverse-engineering a structure to fit them. It inverts the negotiation: once a relationship exists, every structural protection you ask for reads as distrust. We design the structure first, from the commercial logic and the legal position, then run a partner search against it.

That means deciding early whether you need a distributor, an agent, a joint venture, a branch or a wholly owned entity, and being clear about what each one costs you in control, margin, exit flexibility and exposure. In several jurisdictions the difference between an agency agreement and a distribution agreement is the difference between leaving in ninety days and never leaving at all.

Partner identification and the diligence that matters

We screen candidates on capability and on the things that surface later: real ownership behind the corporate veil, political exposure of the beneficial owners, litigation history, payment behaviour with previous principals, and whether the partner's other agencies compete with yours. A partner who is excellent operationally and impossible politically is not a partner.

Reference calls with a partner's former principals are the single highest-yield diligence step available and the one most often skipped because it is awkward to arrange.

Building the position so it can be defended

Market entry that works produces something the incumbent cannot replicate quickly. Sometimes that is technical. More often it is a registration, an approved vendor listing, a distribution licence, a service network, or a relationship with a buyer whose switching cost is high. We identify what the defensible asset will be before the first shipment, then build the entry plan around acquiring it early.

Signals this is the right work

You have been offered a partnership by someone you met at a conference and you cannot independently verify who owns their company. Your product sells well at home and stalls abroad for reasons nobody can articulate. You are choosing between three markets on instinct. A distributor is outperforming and you have realised you have no practical way to replace them.

What you get

  • A primary-source market assessment covering margin capture, entry cost and defensibility
  • A structure recommendation with the control, margin and exit implications of each option priced
  • A screened partner shortlist including beneficial ownership and political exposure
  • Reference findings from each candidate's previous principals
  • A ninety-day entry plan built around acquiring a defensible position early

Common questions

Which markets do you cover?

Nineteen markets across the Levant, the Gulf, North and Sub-Saharan Africa, Turkey, the Caucasus and Central Asia. Where we do not have direct standing we say so rather than subcontract the relationship quietly.

Can you help us replace an underperforming distributor?

Yes, and the first question is always what your existing agreement permits. In several jurisdictions in the region, agency protections make termination expensive or effectively impossible, so the practical route is often a negotiated restructure rather than a replacement.

Do you take commission on deals you introduce?

No. We are paid fees for advice, which keeps our recommendation about whether to proceed genuinely independent of whether you proceed.

Related work

Entering the Gulf on the Right Terms →Syria 2026: From Signed Memorandum to Working Megawatt →

Discuss a mandate

If this describes the problem you are holding, a short conversation will establish quickly whether we are the right people for it.

Start a conversation

Other services: Management Consultancy · Corporate Diplomacy · Project Financing · Project Management · Business Intelligence